Book demo
17 May 2017

An optimist’s guide to the evolutionary forces shaping the IT VAR

It can sometimes feel that the speed of change is unprecedented and that we live in an age of accelerating disruption. Sure it feels that way but how much is down to the way news is disseminated through commercial and social media? Impatience and greed spur on Davidianesque cult-like followers who broadcast how the latest technology will transform businesses. Business ideas which maintain the status quo are sidelined as boring and are not given the same level of exposure.

Whether we are living in the fourth industrial revolution or in the age of acceleration; one could argue there was more technological change in 1903 when the Wright Brothers had their first flight, or when man first stepped on the moon in July 1969. When framed against those achievements where would you place that great disruption – Cloud Computing?

Motivated to make sense of my own, often conflicting ideas, my aim is to debate the changes taking place in the IT channel. Through my work helping partners, many of my peers are asking the same questions about how to thrive, and not just survive, the next five, ten or twenty years in business.

7 Channel Forces

Cloud Computing

The rental of infrastructure by a relatively small number of large suppliers such as Amazon, Microsoft and IBM, is one such force. This rising IT oligarchy and it’s impact on the channel has been talked about extensively but there are many other factors in play.

Business investment

Levels of business investment in the Western world have been in decline despite companies generating record levels of cash. In the UK, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), from 2010 to 2015 the average growth in investment was 5%. In 2016 it fell by 1.5%, the first annual decline since the financial crisis. Business investment consists primarily of buildings, IT, plant and machinery and in a heavily services based economy, such as the UK, IT spend represents a large percentage of the total.

Businesses will invest capital if they feel it can deliver a better return than leaving it to accrue interest but investment is clearly important to improve productivity and drive wage growth. Productivity, as measured by GDP per hour worked is 22% lower in the UK when compared with the USA which has seen higher levels of business investment in recent years.

With base interest rates at historic lows (0.25% in the UK) you would think investment would pick up unless perhaps leaders’ compensation plans make it personally more beneficial to inflate the stock price, through cash buy backs and/or increased dividends.The EY Item Club forecast for business investment in the UK, shown below, does not make for especially happy reading.

Technology Slowdown

This may seem contradictory to the prevailing sentiment about digital acceleration and transformation however from a hardware perspective, there is evidence to suggest this is the case for IT infrastructure. A report by MIT in 2016 suggested chip maker Intel had put the brakes on Moore’s Law citing delays to the new 10nm silicon. It appears the reduction from 14nm is testing the laws of physics. So while some pundits have talked about “entering the second half of the chess board” around 2007, until Quantum computing becomes practical (and that may still be a decade or more away) we may not be going too far, or as fast, into the second half of that chess board.

Enter the Dragon

In China, over seventy million manufacturing jobs have been created since 2000 – vastly more than the combined total of forty-two million manufacturing jobs recorded in Europe and the USA in 2012. Leaving aside Foxconn’s meteoric rise, another company which has risen from #46 in the world’s largest hardware companies in 2009 to #12 today, is Huawei. Its revenues have grown organically from $6B to over $60B in less than ten years. The figures do not state the percentage of revenue generated outside of China but when you consider IBM’s published revenues in the UK fell by 8% between 2013 and 2015, it could be a contributory factor.

Despite the EU’s protectionist stance, will China’s new “Belt and Road” initiative make it more or less likely, we will see Chinese companies take more market share in western markets, that for so long have been dominated by US tech giants?

Do you feel old yet?

According to a research report published by CompTIA in January this year, 40% of traditional IT channel people are expected to retire over the next ten years. When you last attended a big vendor’s conference, what did you see looking around? Even a recent Blockchain expo I attended in London felt like “daddy dancing” with a sea of grey haired people trying to hang out with the cool kids.

Software is eating the world

From software defined everything to software as a service (SaaS) there is a big shift away from commoditised hardware. When software is either a piece of paper or an online licence, is some part of the channel’s role reduced? It is a changing picture but for the traditional vendors IBM and HP, the percentage of software sold via their channels have been significantly less than their equivalent hardware businesses. Fortunately the impact of this force can be offset by the higher margins available.

New kids on the block

There are a new breed of channel players arriving to take your business. Non traditional partner types with SaaS only business models or “cloud-only” solutions, are on the march. In 2016 over 100,000 partners attended Dreamforce, the conference representing Salesforce. Many of these partners are small but they are nibbling around the edges of your business and they are growing in size and volume.

Channel Symptoms

What is the impact of these forces? An analogy is to compare it to the debate about climate change. For some people, there is no evidence of significant impact, for others massive. I know resellers that are having record years selling hardware infrastructure. Like climate change the forces at work are varied in their impact. They can be resisted by great execution or sheltered from by geography.

1. Squeezed margins. Predominantly hardware-based resellers seem to be making net margins in the low single digit figures, 2-3% being typical for a well run company. There are very few pure hardware resellers still around so I suspect some of the margin created is boosted by professional services revenue. When talking to channel players the talk is often of having to run harder to stand still with evidence of a greater number of transactions required for the same level of revenue. I’m also hearing of longer sales cycles which although not immediately apparent, have a negative bearing on the bottom line.

2. Slower revenue growth. With supply outstripping demand the channel in the last few years has started to get serious about marketing. There has been a boom in marketing agencies and marketing roles within the channel. Countless magazine pages and blog posts have extolled the virtues of generating demand through marketing led campaigns with less emphasis on the sales process. Suffice to say many of the business owners I have spoken to, have been left frustrated by the lack of measurable results.

3. Higher staff turnover. This one is harder to measure and single out for the IT channel since there are macro trends which are changing the world of paid work, everything from the “gig economy” to changing employment laws.

4. Business consolidation. In 2016 we saw one of tech industry’s largest acquisitions, that of EMC Corporation by Dell Inc. It is the subject of debate how this will impact the channel but surely any competition upstream is likely to increase competitive pressures in the channel.

Evolutionary Responses

Darkling beetles of the Namib Desert, located on the southwest coast of Africa, live in one of the driest habitats in the world. But some species of Darkling beetle evolved to get the water they need from dew and ocean fog, using their very own body surfaces. Early humans who started farming domesticated animals evolved the ability to digest milk beyond infancy; pretty useful when you have a ready supply of food literally on-tap. The IT channel when faced with the disruptive forces discussed earlier, need to evolve a a little bit quicker than the Namib beetle, or early human settlers.

For those wanting to accelerate the Darwinian process the possible responses are many and can depend on such factors as:

  • What is the core competence or even DNA of the business?
  • Personal preference or interest; what do you like doing with your money and time?
  • Available resources and skills
  • Life cycle of the business and exit plans

In another article I will be delving more into the evolutionary responses taken by partners. It is worthy of more coverage than I can give it here.

To leave you all on a positive note we at Predatar believe the rise of cloud computing presents more opportunities to the channel than it takes away. My twelve year son, who clearly demonstrates far more aptitude for technology than I, is able to build his own unique creations using game engines that I could hardly imagine with my junior Lego set #BITD.

The cloud with its open source software and freely available APIs, allows channel players to create something truly unique to them. The opportunity to build sustainable competitive advantage, not based on labour arbitrage or size but on how quickly a business evolves and adapts to market demands, is at the heart of this debate.

Learn more about
Predatar recovery assurance

27 January 2017

10+ Ways to License Storage Protect (TSM)

We’ve talked about licensing on the blog before, but that was way back in 2013, so it’s about time we revisited it. Why are there 10+ ways to license Storage Protect and what are the benefits and pitfalls of each?

Storage Protect has evolved a long way from its roots, to what has been rebranded to Storage Protect and brought into the wider Spectrum brand or bundle of software defined offerings from IBM.

So let’s list the different ways to license Storage Protect:

  • Processor Value Unit (PVU)
  • Processor Value Unit (PVU) Sub Capacity
  • Capacity Bundle (backend)
  • Capacity Bundle (frontend)
  • Spectrum Suite
  • ASL Capacity backend
  • ASL Capacity frontend
  • Enterprise License Agreement (ELA)
  • Storage Protect Archive
  • Storage Protect for Protectier
  • Storage Protect Device License

There are simply too many to cover in detail here. The important thing is that each has positive and negatives dependent upon the characteristics of the environment in which they are deployed.

Clearing the complexity

Let’s try to demystify these and give some insight into them and when you might use them.

From experience I hear people complaining about Storage Protect as being complicated and too big a challenge to master. It’s not and it doesn’t have to be.

The best way to approach licensing is to start by asking a few questions:

Do I store a lot of data? Do I have a small number of servers or a large number? And one very important one. Am I using the features of Storage Protect that make life easier?

It boils down to this: a ratio between servers and capacity. If I have lots of data and only a few servers I need to license the server. If you have a small amount of data and a large amount of servers, you need to license the capacity.

That then steers you in the direction of one model or another. It’s a steer, but not the final destination.

Customers tell me that one of the biggest issues is compliance. IBM are auditing more and more and if you are using PVU’s, tracking, controlling and governance is not simple. I’ve lost count of the number of customers’ who upgrade their server estate and forget about buying more software to cover the new, bigger, faster processors. Customers’ deploy VMware clusters and get caught out by spiralling PVU counts. Customers’ who forget to install ILMT and if you don’t know what ILMT is, it’s painful.

For some, even if PVU’s are cheaper, they still convert to a capacity model to do away with the management overhead.

When you are on a capacity model you need to think in a different way. It’s easy, it’s great but now you have a new set of concerns. You no longer care about software deployment, you are entitled to install and use every Storage Protect tool, as detailed here. You can install wherever and whenever you want without the need to track servers or how many cores of what type is in every server. And no more ILMT. The only thing you care about is that all important number of TB in the Primary Pool: simple.

Oh and data growth!

You can manage this effectively. Things to think about are

  • Am I using dedupe?
  • Have I switched on compression?
  • Have I cleaned house and removed all the stuff I don’t need?
  • Can I put more data on disk?
  • With access to all the TDP’s have I setup incremental’s on VMWare?

As a business partner who has deployed container pools and tracked the result via our management and automation solution, Predatar, we see an average of 4:1 data reduction. It is possible to get even better reductions, but each account is different and we want to set expectations correctly. The key point here is that Storage Protect is licensed post the data reduction. This can flip the PVU vs Backend Capacity model debate firmly in the favour of a capacity model.

It’s fair to say that I favour capacity models over PVU.

Now I have nailed my flag to the mast it’s worth focusing on two of the most common capacity models: IBM’s Suite for Unified Recovery (SUR) Backend Capacity and ASL.

The first thing to be clear about is that the software code is exactly the same. These are two different ways to access the same software.

What is the difference? The quick answer is that ASL is Opex and SUR is Capex. One is via IBM PA and one is via an IBM Business Partner.

Do you want to rent or to buy?

Buying is nice, we are all used to this, but buying IBM software isn’t a one off fee. Although you buy the software once, after the initial (normally) three-year period, every year IBM asks you to pay for support on the software. This enables you to keep up to date with the software and access support, if you need.

What if the cost of that software support was the same cost as the ASL rental? In my experience the ASL rental can be cheaper. You avoid the upfront Capex expenditure and get the same product for less that the annual IBM PA renewal.

Why is this the case? You are buying ASL at the Business Partners price banding not yours and the majority of cases the Business Partner has a better banding – because they’re buying larger volumes for multiple customers.

ASL was designed to enable Business Partners to ‘aaS’ solutions. This means that you need to buy additional support offerings from the business partner. This doesn’t have to mean cloud or a managed service. My customers just need to use Predatar, or buy a number of Service Units.

Even with this element, I have written a good few business cases that show a customer can get a Fully Managed Service to proactively manage their estate and all the ASL software AND do so for less than the annual IBM PA Renewal and projected new license spend.

So why isn’t everybody doing this?

I really believe more should. As more organisations adopt a pay as you go, or utility mindset, it will become more popular.

One of the reasons I see people not going for ASL is a sense of being locked into a particular Business Partner. That is considered a risk and one that outweighs the financial benefits. Another is that IBM sellers do not recommend it. As a cynic, the revenue is associated to the Business Partner not the end user, so does not go towards individual’s targets. IBM sellers do get paid on it, but they don’t all know that or know how to claim it. This is one of the reasons we’re running sessions with our IBM contacts to help them understand this better.

Adding up the licensing options

As I said at the start, every model has positives and negatives. Each option can be easily modelled with real numbers and one size does not fit all. There is no need for guess work.

What I always encourage my customers to do is review their options regularly. There are always ways to reduce software costs, the broader question is, are the benefits worth the cost of change?

If you want to review your Storage Protect licensing model, Predatar have experts who can help you analyse your licensing and ensure you’re getting the best possible value from your business recovery platform. Don’t hesitate to email on info@Predatar.com or call to organise your initial free licensing review to see if you can save costs, or get better value from your existing implementation.

Due to popular demand, we’ve created an update to this blog. Please read 10 more ways to licence Storage Protect or find out how much you could save with our Storage Protect savings calculator.

Learn more about
Predatar recovery assurance